Berminat dengan domain ini?

Emailkan harga tawaran anda ke

Terima kasih.


 

Pro Vaccines vs Pro Safety
Which side are you on?

 

ORANG TAK VAKSIN MEMBAHAYAKAN ORANG LAIN?
1- BUAT PERSEPSI SALAH dan paksa orang percaya. Ini termasuk fitnah
2- Boleh berikan bukti bahawa ORANG YG DAH VAKSIN TAK SEBARKAN VIRUS?
3- DG kata delta boleh beranak dalam hidung orang vaksin dan menyebarkannya
4- Cdc kata yg vaccinated dan unvaccinated SAMA sahaja menyebar virus (CDC :Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Individuals Have Similar Viral Loads in Communities).
5- Wanita lengkap 2 dos cetus cluster di sabah. (Mudah shj nak search)
6- Kalau begitu kenapa tohmah orang tidak vaksin membahayakan?
7- Tak rasa bersalah tohmah arang begitu sedang HAKIKATNYA KEDUA2 TETAP MENYEBARKAN VIRUS DAN DIJANGKITI?
8- Apabila anda begitu yakin dengan vaksin, lalu kenapa begitu takut dengan orang belum vaksin sedang anda sudah ada perisai baju besi!
9- Kelihatan anda pun tak begitu yakin dengan vaksin. Tapi tekan orang suruh vaksin
10- Begitulah persepsi yang cuba diwujudkan hingga org yg kurang akal percaya bulat-bulat.
11- Mereka bina lagi persepsi jahat jangan kerja dan jangan bercampur dengan orang tak vaksin
13- Sebar lagi hasutan supaya orang tak vaksin patut dibuang kerja.
14- Kita bertanya, atas alasan apa nak buang mereka. Kesalahan apa?
15- Bahaya? Apa yang bahaya sedang keduanya pada tahap sama
16- Hak mereka tak nak vaksin kena jaga, hak kita yang vaksin macammana pula?
17- Kita tanya lagi, hak berkenaan apa sebenarnya? Bila keduanya pada tahap yang sama.
18- Kerajaan cakap pilihan, lepas tu paksa cucuk. TIDAK ZALIM?
19- Paksa cucuk dan tak mahu bertanggungjawab. TIDAK ZALIM?
20- Tuduh orang tidak vaksin membahayakan orang lain – TIDAK ZALIM?
21- Suruh orang tak vaksin dibuang kerja – TIDAK ZALIM?
22- Orang yg melakukan kezaliman dan orang yang menyokong kezaliman sama2 berdosa
23- DAN SIAPA YG TUHAN AKAN TOLONG, ORANG YG ZALIM ATAU ORG YG DIZALIMI?
**Sila ulang baca dan fahami logiknya. Copy paste dan bincangkan dengan yang lain supaya orang Islam tidak berpecah belah dan bertelagah sesama sendiri

 

 

Sementara itu, berhati-hati dengan “saranan, pandangan para doktor”. Bukan semua, tapi sebahagian para doktor perubatan di hospital / klinik dipengaruh pihak pemasaran ( Pro-Pharma / Pro-Vac )seterusnya menidakkan fakta dan kajian saintifik untuk kebaikkan umum, demi kepentingan dan keuntungan diri sendiri.

Juga utamakan pandangan dan saranan dari pakar bidang yang menjalankan kajian (Prof, Dr, Penyelidik) berbanding para doktor perubatan yang majoriti berpandu pada bahan / data yang “dibekalkan” pihak atasan/pemasaran.

Semak sumber maklumat yang anda terima dan semak juga background pihak yang memberikan pandangan / sumber rujukan yang digunakan. Terdapat juga pihak yang memberikan pandangan berkaitan isu vaksin adalah tidak adil dimana mereka juga antara penerima pelbagai bentuk geran / dana dari syarikat pengeluar vaksin covid 19.

Logiknya di mana?

Untuk data kematian berdasarkan jenis vaksin yang dilaporkan kepada CDC, boleh rujuk di

 

 

 

Pautan info dari pakar penyelidik:

Dr Sherri Tenpeny –> Web / Telegram

Dr. Sherri J. Tenpenny is an osteopathic medical doctor, board certified in three medical specialties. Widely regarded as the most knowledgeable and outspoken physician on the adverse impact that vaccines can have on health, Dr. Tenpenny has been a guest on hundreds of radio and national television programs (including the Dr. Oz Show and the Today Show Australia). She has lectured at Cleveland State University and Case Western Reserve Medical School, and has been a speaker at conventions, both nationally and internationally, as a recognized expert on a wide range topics within the field of Integrative Medicine including breast health, breast thermography, women’s hormones, medical uses of iodine and the adverse effects vaccines have on health.

 

Robert W Malone, MD –> Twitter / Telegram

Inventor of mRNA vaccines and RNA as a drug, Bench to Bedside vaccines and biologics consulting.

 

Prof Martin Kulldorff –> Twitter

Professor Harvard Medical School. Disease surveillance methods. Infectious disease outbreaks. Vaccine safety. Free SaTScan, TreeScan and RSequential software.

 

Dr John B. –> Twitter / Telegram

Scientist, lecturer & father | Whistleblower

 

Dr Byram Bridle –> Web

BYRAM BRIDLE IS A “VIRAL IMMUNOLOGIST WHO IS PASSIONATE ABOUT IMPROVING LIFE”… ALBEIT NOT BY REDUCING THE SPREAD OF COVID-19 MISINFORMATION

 

 

AEFI CASES – Covid Vaccines –> Telegram

Kompilasi kes² AEFI (Adverse Events Following Immunisation) vaksin Covid:

 

 

COVID-19 VACCINE Considerations –> Web

Colleen Huber, NMD, physician and expert witness in vaccine injury court cases
February 21, 2021, last updated July 31, 2021

 

 

Apa Pemenang Nobel fikirkan?

Nobel Prize winner: Mass COVID vaccination an ‘unacceptable mistake’
2021-05-19
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/nobel-prize-winner-mass-covid-vaccination-an-unacceptable-mistake-that-is-creating-the-variants
“In every country, ‘the curve of vaccination is followed by the curve of deaths,’ the famous virologist said.”

“May 19, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) – French virologist and Nobel Prize winner Luc Montagnier called mass vaccination against the coronavirus during the pandemic “unthinkable” and a historical blunder that is “creating the variants” and leading to deaths from the disease.”

 

 

Nobel Laureate Luc Montagnier – Warns Covid Vaccine May Lead to ‘Neurodegenerative Illness’ (Video)
2021-05-29
https://rairfoundation.com/nobel-laureate-luc-montagnier-warns-covid-vaccine-may-lead-to-neurodegenerative-illness-video/
“During a stunning interview, Nobel Prize winner Luc Montagnier expressed strong concerns about the coronavirus vaccine’s mid-term, long-term, and even generational consequences.

Montagnier warned that “neurodegenerative illness” is a potential side effect of the coronavirus vaccine and said in no uncertain terms that he is “outraged” about the widespread vaccination of children.

The prominent virologist further disputed an online rumor likely meant to distract from his viral observation, first translated from French at RAIR Foundation USA, that the coronavirus vaccine is the cause of the variants.”

 

 

 

Bombshell: Nobel Prize Winner Reveals – Covid Vaccine is ‘Creating Variants’
2021-05-18

Prof Luc Montagnier
French virologist and 2008 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for his discovery of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).

https://rairfoundation.com/bombshell-nobel-prize-winner-reveals-covid-vaccine-is-creating-variants/
“Prof. Montagnier said that epidemiologists know but are “silent” about the phenomenon, known as “Antibody-Dependent Enhancement” (ADE). In the articles that mention ADE, the concerns expressed by Prof. Montagnier are dismissed. “Scientists say that ADE is pretty much a non-issue with COVID-19 vaccines,” an article at Medpage Today reported in March.

Prof. Montagnier explained that the trend is happening in “each country” where “the curve of vaccination is followed by the curve of deaths.””

 

 

Now, basically, the only way you can test,
Whether there is any risk,
when people are infected with the virus,
infect they been given vaccine,
is perhaps a progressively larger number of people
have their vaccinated,
and watch what happen when they get infected
or if they get infected,
so that process could probably going very very quickly,
depending on what level of risk people is conns….err (starting been nervous?),
prepare to take,
and, err, i don’t think the time realistic,
to think you will have a…a vaccine later this year,
the, er…the big issues is, of course, making numerous amount of it
if it looks to be successful!

Peter C. Doherty
Nobel Laureate
Fields: Medicine, Immunology
2020-05-3
https://youtu.be/Jstj41fen3s?t=167
Statment time: 2:47 – 3:25

 

Penerbitan Kajian

 

Sebelum ini geng Pro-Vac / Pro-Pharma / Geng Jarum, beria menidakkan potensi Ivermectin dan secara total menyatakan Ivermectin adalah hanya sesuai untuk haiwan. Namun, setelah pelbagai bukti kajian muncul, dbuktikan potensinya, kelihatan geng Pro-Vac / Pro-Pharma & Geng jarum sudah mula hilang modal apabila bukti dan kebenaran sukar disangkal.

[1] COVID-19 and Ivermectin: Potential threats associated with human use,
Journal of Molecular Structure, Volume 1243, 2021, 130808, ISSN 0022-2860,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2021.130808.

This manuscript overviews the background and potential threats associated with the off-label use of IVM as prophylactic drug or treatment option against COVID-19 virus.

 

[2] Santin AD, Scheim DE, McCullough PA, Yagisawa M, Borody TJ. Ivermectin: a multifaceted drug of Nobel prize-honoured distinction with indicated efficacy against a new global scourge, COVID-19. New Microbes New Infect. 2021 Aug 3;43:100924. doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2021.100924. PMID: 34466270; PMCID: PMC8383101.

We believe that the evidence to date supports the worldwide extension of IVM treatments for COVID-19, complementary to immunizations.

 

 

[3] Artemisia annua hot-water extracts show potent activity in vitro against Covid-19 variants

Hot-water (tea infusion) extracts of A. annua are active against SARS-CoV-2 and its variants
alpha, beta, gamma, delta, and kappa. In our original report, anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity inversely
correlated with ART content. Herein, similar responses are noted for gamma, delta, and kappa
wherein the A. annua cultivar with the lowest ART content, BUR, generally had the lowest
(most effective) IC50. These results demonstrate the potential of the extracts as treatments in
the global fight against this constantly evolving virus. We urge WHO to consider including
extracts and encapsulated dried leaves in their announced clinical trials that already include
artesunate (Kupferschmidt, 2021). We aim to test preclinical models of SARS-CoV-2 in rodent
models (Dinnon et al., 2020; Gu et al., 2020) that could help advance A. annua as an
inexpensive therapeutic in parts of the world where logistic issues such as delivery require
longer time to achieve vaccination levels that would ultimately quell this pandemic.

 

 

[4] Cédric Annweiler, Mélinda Beaudenon, Romain Simon, Mialy Guenet, Marie Otekpo, Thomas Célarier, Jennifer Gautier. Vitamin D supplementation prior to or during COVID-19 associated with better 3-month survival in geriatric patients: Extension phase of the GERIA-COVID study. The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Volume 213, 2021, 105958, ISSN 0960-0760, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2021.105958.
(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960076021001515)

Abstract: Background
The objective of this extension phase of the quasi-experimental GERIA−COVID study was to determine whether vitamin D3 supplementation taken prior to or during COVID-19 was associated with better 3-month survival in geriatric patients hospitalized for COVID-19.

Methods: Intervention group was defined as all participants supplemented with vitamin D3 prior to or during COVID-19 (n = 67). Supplements were either bolus vitamin D3 (ie, 50,000 IU per month, or 80,000 IU or 100,000 IU or 200,000 IU every 2–3 months), or daily supplementation with 800 IU. Comparator group involved those without vitamin D supplements (n = 28). Outcome was 3-month mortality. Covariables were age, sex, functional abilities, history of malignancies, cardiomyopathy, undernutrition, number of acute health issues, antibiotics use, systemic corticosteroids use, and 25(OH)D concentration.

Results:
76.1 % (n = 51) of participants survived at 3 months in Intervention group, compared to only 53.6 % (n = 15) in Comparator group (P = 0.03). The fully-adjusted hazard ratio for 3-month mortality was HR = 0.23 [95 %CI: 0.09;0.58](P = 0.002) in Intervention group compared to Comparator group. Intervention group had also longer survival time (log-rank P = 0.008).

Conclusions:
Vitamin D3 supplementation was associated with better 3-month survival in older COVID-19 patients.
Keywords: Vitamin D; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Treatment; Epidemiology; Older adults

 

.

Info & Potential Solution?

Study: Inorganic polyphosphates can help treat, prevent COVID-19 variants –> Baca

“We experimentally proved that inorganic polyphosphates prevent the coronavirus from recognizing human cells and exert an antiviral action against the virus,” Kim said in a statement.

“The findings were so groundbreaking that we repeated the experiments for almost a year together with Massimo Zollo from CEINGE to prove their [inorganic polyphosphates’] functions.”

Further testing will take about five months, a representative of Haim Bio said, adding that the company hopes to come up with a product to deliver the substance via nasal spray by next February (2022).

 


Now, rehat sebentar, untuk and fikirkan logiknya.

Adakah virus covid 19 in boleh memilih magsanya? jawapan mudah dan jelas adalah tidak. Semua pihak boleh & berisiko untuk dijangkiti virus covid 19. Jadi mengapa masih banyak tempat tertentu dibenarkan dibuka dan dikunjungi ramai manusia, manakala sebahagian tempat lain pula bergitu ketat syarat dan banyak halangan untuk rakyat hadir? Adakah virus covid 19 boleh kenal mall vs masjid? atau Langkawi vs perkarangan Parlimen?

Ketidak berkesanan vaksin percubaan sedia ada untuk melindungi penerimanya, jelas bukan salah mereka yang memilih untuk tidak mengambil vaksin tersebut. Seharusnya tanya pada pihak yang mencucuk and dan pihak yang membekalkan vaksin tersebut. Oh ya, anda yang dicucuk sudah tandatangan beri kebenaran dan sangup ambil risiko sendiri.

Anda bijak dan berani. Terima kasih atas pengorbanan anda penerima awal vaksin, bagi membolehkan kajian terus dilakukan pada kesan-kesan sampingan jangka panjang (jangan lupa laporkan sebarang side effect di mySejahtera ya). Semoga tidak lama lagi akan ada ubatan atau vaksin yang lebih selamat untuk kami yang Pro-Safety ini. Tq.

 

 

Adakah ini masa hadapan yang anda (diberi)pilih?

.